https://library.icmglt.org/files/original/4ccd44ad1022bf1b49a173da52457943.png bf34efe3bdb2a0c17b88ba27d84d81e1 Electronic Resource View Source <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00134.xDigitalObjectIdentifier(DOI)">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00134.xDigitalObjectIdentifier(DOI)</a> Document Type Journal article Author(s) Thomas Blass Volume Vol. 29 Issue No. 5 Journal Name Journal of Applied Social Psychology Publication Date 1999 Language English Access Restricted Access Abstract Guided by the belief that we cannot make broad extrapolations from the obedience studies without first firmly establishing what has and has not been found using the paradigm itself, this article draws on 35 years of accumulated research and writings on the obedience paradigm to present a status report on the following salient questions and issues surrounding obedience to authority: (a) How should we construe the nature of authority in the obedience experiment? (b) Do predictions of those unfamiliar with the obedience experiment underestimate the actual obedience rates? (c) Are there gender differences in obedience? and (d) Have obedience rates changed over time? Cataloger Kristen Walker Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource The Milgram Paradigm After 35 Years: Some Things We Now Know About Obedience to Authority Subject The topic of the resource Psychology Authority Gender Differences Milgram Paradigm Obedience Obedience Studies