https://library.icmglt.org/files/original/6303c50b8528ce02ff98c6f847005acd.jpeg 9cd3dcef4aae443704cbe6718de023d5 https://library.icmglt.org/files/original/227e8cf42eff294e176684016564cdda.pdf 868dcff458484ed940a08cc3d467db4d Electronic Resource Access Open Access Document Type Journal article Author(s) Ann De Shalit, Emily van der Meulen, Michael Orsini, Rachel Laforest, Adrian Guta Volume Vol. 380 Publisher Elsevier Journal Name Social Science & Medicine Publication Date 2025 ISBN 18792987 Region Canada Abstract Globally, charitable organizations vitally advocate for health equity by addressing social-structural determinants like income inequality, housing insecurity, and systemic discrimination through political activities, coalition building, and direct interventions. This article examines the discursive, legislative/political, and organizational elements shaping the political activities of charities working to transform the social-structural determinants of health and health inequity in Ontario, Canada. We conducted 28 in-depth interviews with staff from 24 charities addressing social-structural issues, including harm reduction, mental health, disability rights, migrant justice, housing access, and integrated social services. Drawing on Situational Analysis, our findings reveal that some charities’ pursuit of political advocacy and activism against root causes of health inequities aligns with their discursive framing as agents of democratization, while the reluctance and self-imposed restrictions of other charities reflects the framing of charities as (non)compliant and (in)competent. Federal regulations and provincial political regimes continue to influence the ability of charities to challenge structural barriers, often through funding dynamics. Organizational elements including size, scope, leadership, capacity, and budgeting further shape political engagement around social-structural change. We argue these elements are undergirded by neoliberal governance, leading some charities to prioritize efficiency and accountability to funders over systemic equity and social justice, and reflect broader trends in governance that constrain civil society’s capacity to address health inequities Despite these factors, many charities balance organizational responsibilities with transformative aims. Supporting the democratic role of charities thus requires adequate funding, resources, and capacity building to enable them to tackle entrenched structures of health inequity while maintaining essential services. Cataloger Edrina Adjei-Manu Language English View Source <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118145">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118145</a> Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource We Like to be in the Tent: How charitable organizations navigate political advocacy for health equity Subject The topic of the resource Pressure groups Canada Civil Rights Movement Health Care Data Health Equity