https://library.icmglt.org/files/original/33dbc9bb30e9d44bcafa61eec1334756.pdf 4613c678a165ee1d919b4360db4f7d92 Electronic Resource View Source <a href="https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3254-13.2013">https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3254-13.2013</a> Document Type Journal article Author(s) Owen D. Jones, René Marois, Martha J. Farah, Henry T. Greely Volume Vol. 33 Issue No. 45 Journal Name Journal of Neuroscience Publication Date 2013 Language English Access Open Access Abstract Law and neuroscience seem strange bedfellows. But the engagement of law with neuroscientific evidence was inevitable. For one thing, the effectiveness of legal systems in regulating behavior and meting out justice often depends on weighing evidence about how and why a person behaved as he or she did. And these are things that neuroscience can sometimes illuminate. For another, lawyers are ethically bound to champion their clients' interests. So they remain alert for new, relevant, or potentially persuasive information, such as neuroscience may at times offer, that could help to explain or contextualize behavior of their clients. Cataloger Kristen Walker Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Law and Neuroscience Subject The topic of the resource Neurosciences--Law and legislation Law Neurosciences