16 12 431 https://library.icmglt.org/files/original/cdcb1c370f95240aef22df2dfd4da08d.png aef16f910c2e17822ab852c3e0a0faff Electronic Resource View Source <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012251338551">https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012251338551</a> Document Type Journal article Author(s) Sinéad McIntyre, Claudia Cooper, Natalia Chemas, Sukey Parnell Johnson, Paul Higgs, Wendy Martin, Sarah Morgan-Trimmer, Alexandra Burton, Michaela Poppe, and Ellie Whitfield Volume Vol. 25 Issue No. 3 Publisher Sage Journal Name Dementia Publication Date 2026 ISBN 14713012, 17412684 Language English Access Open Access Abstract Visual research, including photovoice methods are increasingly used to elicit the experiences of people living with memory loss, though few such studies have investigated the impact of produced images on audiences. Drawing on Freire’s empowerment pedagogy, we aimed to explore how a photography exhibition, created by individuals with memory concerns participating in the APPLE-Tree (Active Prevention in People at risk of dementia through Lifestyle, bEhaviour change and Technology to build REsiliEnce) dementia prevention programme contributed to an understanding on life with memory loss, and whether it reduced any stigma, among its co-producers and audience. Approximately 200 people attended the exhibition launch, of whom 97 completed a survey. We interviewed two co-producers with lived experience of memory problems and seven academic co-producers. In our thematic analysis of survey responses and interview transcripts, we developed three themes: (1) Increasing understanding by giving voice to participants: seeing unique individuals behind the work; (2) The power of visual methods to communicate research findings: interviewees described how the quality of the works and exhibition created an atmosphere that honoured participants as artists, valuing and respecting their messages; (3) Evoking emotions: fear and hope: The audience described the exhibition’s power to evoke strong emotions of fear at the risk of losing “treasured memories” and hope of living successfully with memory loss. Some attendees and study team members felt motivated to try to reduce their future dementia risk. We consider the value of public engagement using arts-based co-production, and the impact of the exhibition in this field. We explore how our findings reflect notions of empowerment in two juxtaposing ways: empowerment to express how living with memory loss feels as a means of activism to reduce associated stigma, and empowerment to change future dementia risk through lifestyle changes. Cataloger Shaunda King Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource ‘Memories We Treasure’: Evaluating the impact on co-designers and audiences of a photographic exhibition by participants with memory problems Subject The topic of the resource Dementia in art Dementia Mild cognitive impairment Stigma https://library.icmglt.org/files/original/ab6f551e294a3ddf107e8ea4586f3a3a.pdf c55bb7fd345a551cddfba6faa26ce22e Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Multigenerational Legacies of Trauma of Aboriginal Australians Subject The topic of the resource Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples Electronic Resource View Source <a href="https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5d48cb4d61091100011eded9/t/686e849babf2784b9958cf86/1752073378071/CRIS+2.0_Inoculations+against+misinformation_Dunn_Denson.pdf">https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5d48cb4d61091100011eded9/t/686e849babf2784b9958cf86/1752073378071/CRIS+2.0_Inoculations+against+misinformation_Dunn_Denson.pdf</a> Document Type Government report Author(s) Nida Denson, Alexandra Lee, Alanna Kamp, Fethi Mansouri, Amanuel Elias, Rachel Sharples, Oznur Sahin, Karen Connelly, Yin Paradies, Craig McGarty, & Kevin Dunn Publisher Centre for Resilient and Inclusive Societies Publication Date 2025 Region Australia Language English Access Open Access Abstract This report was produced on unceded Aboriginal Country. We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of the lands in which the study was researched and written. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and acknowledge Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities’ ongoing commitment to empowerment, healing and self-determination. This report was produced as part of the project Emerging vectors and sources of racism: Responding to online challenges to social cohesion, funded through the Centre for Resilient and Inclusive Societies (CRIS). The Centre for Resilient and Inclusive Societies The Centre for Resilient and Inclusive Societies (CRIS) is an independent think-tank researching some of the trickiest challenges facing Australian society. This includes racism, systemic bias and disadvantage, economic inequities, extremism, discrimination, and other forms of societal division. Our researchers are passionate about creating meaningful social change. We produce robust empirical evidence and rigorous analysis that shapes policies for social inclusion and resilience and supports people and communities working in these fields. At the centre of our approach is a genuinely inclusive and collaborative practice. We partner with organisations working on the ground and collaborate with communities at all stages of the research process, from design to dissemination. CRIS is made up of Australian academic, community and industry partners: Deakin University (lead partner) Western Sydney University Victoria University Australian Multicultural Foundation Centre for Multicultural Youth Cataloger Shaunda King Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource 'Inoculations' Against Racist Misinformation: An Australian online test Subject The topic of the resource Misinformation Australia Disinformation Inoculation intervention Misinformation Racism https://library.icmglt.org/files/original/72ad48f0ee57e728dbe303740d0b48ed.gif a316f1db8394122b560de056647ba58f https://library.icmglt.org/files/original/055b37c2a914318270d5f952649d07b3.pdf 56f4cd5def474f78feeb9836ab53409b Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Multigenerational Legacies of Trauma of Indigenous Canadians (First Nations, Métis, Inuit) Electronic Resource View Source <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108529">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108529</a> Document Type Journal article Author(s) Marni Brownell, Rick Linden, Nathan C. Nickel, Lorna Turnbull, Matthew Sanscartier, Kayla Frank, Lindey Courchene, Wendy Au, Jennifer E. Enns, Janelle B. Lee, Hannah Owczar, Chelsey McDougall, Scott McCulloch, Cora Morgan Volume Vol. 178 Issue No. 108529 Publisher Elsevier Journal Name Children and Youth Services Review Publication Date 2025 ISBN 1907409 Region Canada Language English Access Open Access Abstract Using linked, population-wide administrative data from Manitoba, Canada, we identified all children born in 1994 and followed them into early adulthood. We examined sociodemographics, educational achievement, involvement with child protection services (CPS), justice system contacts, and First Nations identity. We investigated the extent of overlap between ever being in out-of-home care of CPS and being charged with a crime in the youth criminal justice system, and how being First Nations intersects with these systems. We found that 36.4% of youth ever in care had a criminal charge between age 12–17, compared with 3.8% of youth with no CPS histories. Although First Nations comprise less than 15% of the Manitoba population, they accounted for 57% of children in care and 50.2% of youth with a criminal charge. More than 10 times as many First Nations youth had both a history of being in care and were charged with a crime, compared with all other Manitoba youth. Reducing the number of children in CPS care has the potential to reduce youth criminal justice system involvement. Actions to reduce the number of children in care should be based on policies that address socioeconomic disparities and systemic discrimination and through community-based First Nations-led programs. Proportional, timely and culturally appropriate extra-judicial measures geared toward addressing grief and trauma could reduce subsequent justice system involvement. Engagement of the communities most affected by the cross-over between child protection and youth criminal justice – marginalized, racialized, and minoritized populations – is essential for effective program and policy development. Cataloger Shaunda King Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource ‘Crossover Kids’ in Manitoba: The intersection of the child protection system, youth criminal justice system and First Nations identity Subject The topic of the resource Child welfare Canada Child Protection System First Nations Youth Criminal Justice System https://library.icmglt.org/files/original/254a2c9bf9002bd593b86c7ab1b06896.png 371d524d47f679a8adbd94c6e87d2b27 https://library.icmglt.org/files/original/7ea708b2ca7395b0915dbc1d065f87be.pdf 17b78f7bc7ec13830cfe973e73417fbf Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Multigenerational Legacies of Trauma of Aboriginal Australians Subject The topic of the resource Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples Electronic Resource View Source <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02675-0">https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02675-0</a> Document Type Journal article Author(s) Summer May Finlay, Amohia Boulton, Jenni Judd, Bronwyn Fredericks, Janaya Pender, James A. Smith, Helen Simpson, Yvette Roe, Sophie Kerrigan, Anna Temby, Margaret Cargo Volume Vol. 24 Issue No. 303 Publisher Springer Nature Journal Name International Journal for Equity in Health Publication Date 2025 ISBN 14759276 Region Australia Language English Access Open Access Abstract Background In Australia, billions of dollars are spent on Indigenous programs, services, and initiatives annually; however, more evidence is needed regarding which modes of commissioning program evaluations best benefit Indigenous communities. The Australian Productivity Commission called for ‘more and better’ evaluations of Indigenous programs, and commissioning processes that engage Indigenous communities, organisations, and leaders. So, too, have Indigenous representative organisations, Indigenous services, and stakeholders. To date, few studies have sought to characterise the commissioning practices of government and non-government organisations surrounding Indigenous health and wellbeing programs. Fewer still have investigated the role of Indigenous engagement and leadership before, during and after the commissioning process. Methods Using Indigenous Standpoint Theory and a qualitative approach, this study illuminates the perceptions of Australian Indigenous and non-Indigenous commissioners, evaluators, and providers on the commissioning of evaluated Indigenous health and wellbeing programs. Results Building on a published scoping review by undertaking 23 qualitative interviews with 35 Australianbased participants about commissioning practices, this study verifies and canvases the strengths of individual commissioning models, and the interplay between power, cultural safety, and reciprocity in the commissioning space. The paper also considers the relationship between these three factors along a continuum of practice and posits a sliding scale across the five commissioning models. Conclusions To improve the quality of evaluations further attention needs to be paid to the commissioner’s cultural capability. Additionally, Commissioners need to develop their understanding of the relationship between Commissioner and Indigenous people’s power and the utility of evaluations. Cataloger Shaunda King Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource ‘Activating Indigenous Ways’ – perceptions of how Australian Indigenous health and wellbeing program evaluations are commissioned and future recommendations Subject The topic of the resource Indigenous peoples--Social conditions Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australia Indigenous Health Public Policy Wellbeing https://library.icmglt.org/files/original/6ecb5d7380f2d61b391967afbaa48ae7.png aef16f910c2e17822ab852c3e0a0faff Electronic Resource View Source <a href="https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2026-24629-001">https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2026-24629-001</a> Document Type Journal article Author(s) Jackie June ter Heide, Bart Nauta, Tine Molendijk, Miranda Olff Volume Vol. 32 Issue No. 3 Publisher American Psychological Association Journal Name Traumatology Publication Date 2025 ISBN 10859373 Region Bosnia Language English Access Restricted Access Abstract During peacekeeping missions, military personnel may be exposed to potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs). Little is known about how these PMIEs and their impact are experienced by peacekeepers themselves. In 1995, the Dutchbat III peacekeeping mission in Srebrenica, Bosnia, was unable to prevent mass ethnic violence and genocide. This study of military veterans of the Dutchbat III mission focused on the question of how they perceived their mission, the societal response to the mission, and its impact 25 years after its completion. The study’s aim was to increase our understanding of what PMIEs and moral injury in veterans of peacekeeping missions entail. The study concerned a secondary analysis of qualitative data on the well-being of Dutchbat III veterans using a moral injury framework. Nineteen interviews were conducted with veterans who experienced different levels of well-being. Data were analyzed with Max Qualitative Data Analysis 2020 using open, axial, and selective coding. Outcomes showed that the Dutchbat III mission was experienced as morally injurious by some veterans, due to an inability to intervene as well as to a feeling of betrayal during and after the mission. Attributions of personal responsibility and negative public portrayal increased vulnerability to negative psychosocial outcomes. Outcomes consisted of moral injury-related emotions such as guilt and shame, grief, anger, and powerlessness, as well as positive moral emotions and moral growth. Preparation for peacekeeping missions, acknowledgment of responsibilities, and support for dealing with PMIEs and public scrutiny may act as a buffer against the development of long-term moral injury outcomes after peacekeeping missions. Cataloger Shaunda King Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource The Crack in Our Souls: Military veterans’ perceptions of a potentially morally injurious peacekeeping mission. Subject The topic of the resource Moral injuries Bosnia Moral Injury Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Veterans https://library.icmglt.org/files/original/732bdf29c189e5fa937949082baa765e.pdf 4fb31ca5384e821f1bf6fcedba7671e0 Electronic Resource View Source <a href="https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.4011">https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.4011</a> Document Type Dissertation Author(s) Christine Atalie da Rosa Publisher Portland State University Publication Date 2025 Region Oregon, United States Language English Access Open Access Abstract As wildfires increase in frequency and severity in rural communities, disaster management agencies are seeking to collaborate with community-based organizations (CBOs) working with rural, low-income Latin@/e/x communities to build wildfire resilience. This qualitative case study examines the critical role of CBOs rooted in their local, predominately low-income Latin@/e/x communities as cultural brokers in supporting Latin@/e/x wildfire survivors following the 2020 "Mobile Home Parks" Fire in a rural county in Oregon. Drawing from 23 semi-structured interviews, three focus groups, a review of relevant documents, and participant observations, the research investigates how Latin@/e/x CBOs navigated the complex cultural landscape between wildfire survivors and traditional disaster recovery frameworks. Namely, this research aims to address the following research questions: To what extent, and how, do Latin@/e/x CBOs leverage culturally rooted knowledge within the communities they work with to create opportunities for collective healing? What challenges do Latin@/e/x CBOs face in integrating culturally rooted knowledge into disaster resilience programs for low-income, rural Latin@/e/x communities? What opportunities exist for mutual learning and collaboration between diverse, local community practices and state disaster resilience frameworks? This case study examines how institutionalized disaster recovery systems, designed for administrative efficiency, often overlook the cultural realities of Latin@/e/x wildfire survivors. The research reveals significant challenges in wildfire recovery for Latin@/e/x communities, including linguistic barriers, resource scarcity, systemic trauma, and cultural disconnection. When disaster recovery frameworks clash with local culture, those with the least institutional power bear the greatest risk. The findings reveal how standardized approaches can unintentionally reproduce systemic vulnerabilities rather than support transformational, culturally rooted resilience. Effective cultural brokering between conventional disaster management agencies and Latin@/e/x wildfire-impacted communities requires institutional commitment to long-term leadership development, the cultivation of institutional humility, sustained relationship-building before and after disasters, meaningful policy reforms, and robust accountability mechanisms. This study proposes an expanded conceptualization of cultural brokering at an organizational level for understanding how cultural brokering can operate as a multidirectional process with transformative potential. It differentiates between two distinct approaches: one-way and multi-way cultural brokering. One-way cultural brokering refers to cultural translation in one direction, aiming to focus on improving access to existing conventional disaster recovery systems and helping Latin@/e/x wildfire survivors navigate institutional processes through linguistic interventions, case management, and culturally rooted outreach strategies. Multi-way cultural brokering refers to a circular cultural translation direction where communities are able to create new disaster recovery paths rooted in local wildfire survivor culture in partnership with conventional disaster recovery allies. This approach improves safety and roots in core community challenges to recovery because it offers a transformative approach that centers community priorities, lived experiences, and cultural resources. By positioning local cultural knowledge as essential rather than supplemental to conventional approaches to wildfire recovery programming, these organizations have developed innovative pathways for grief, healing, and transformational resilience for their wildfire survivor service recipients. This approach reimagines disaster recovery and resilience programming by recognizing community members as the most crucial recovery resource, establishing culturally rooted and trauma informed healing processes, and developing leadership and political engagement among survivors. The findings have profound implications for disaster management, highlighting the critical importance of cultural knowledge, community expertise, and relationship-centered collaboration. This study demonstrates that CBOs can leverage their cultural knowledge in ways that improve the services they provide. However, to be able to leverage that cultural knowledge, they and the community members they work with should be redesignated as decision-makers rather than solely service providers or advocates. By positioning Latin@/e/x community members as the primary architects of their own recovery, this approach offers an organizational model for creating more equitable, responsive, and transformative disaster resilience strategies. This shift requires shared governance models where CBOs, government agencies, and funders collectively determine recovery priorities and program implementation. These shared governance models should also reflect a revision of flexible wildfire disaster recovery assessment tools that can better reflect diverse living arrangements, informal housing networks, and cultural understandings of recovery CBOs operate within. Cataloger Haley Lesemann Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Beyond Translating Cultures: Organizational Cultural Brokering and Latin@/e/x Community Resilience after the "Mobile Home Parks" Fire Subject The topic of the resource Community organization--Oregon Cultural Competency Disaster Response Healing Hispanic Communities Latinos Natural Disasters Resilience Rural Communities Social Work https://library.icmglt.org/files/original/cc2ff94f903de8cd0db2048323d952a7.png aef16f910c2e17822ab852c3e0a0faff Electronic Resource View Source <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/1757975913490427">https://doi.org/10.1177/1757975913490427</a> Document Type Journal article Author(s) Karen McPhail-Bell, Bronwyn Fredericks, Mark Brough Volume Vol. 20 Issue No. 2 Publisher SAGE Publications Journal Name Global Health Promotion Publication Date 2013 ISBN 17579767 Language English Access Restricted Access Abstract Introduction: The Ottawa Charter is undeniably of pivotal importance in the history of ideas associated with the establishment of health promotion. There is much to applaud in a charter which responds to the need to take action on the social and economic determinants of health and which seeks to empower communities to be at the centre of this. Such accolades tend to position the Ottawa Charter as ‘beyond critique’; a taken-for-granted ‘given’ in the history of health promotion. In contrast, we argue it is imperative to critically reflect on its ‘manufacture’ and assess the possibility that certain voices have been privileged, and others marginalized. Methods: This paper re-examines the 1986 Ottawa Conference including its background papers from a postcolonial standpoint. We use critical discourse analysis as a tool to identify the enactment of power within the production of the Ottawa health promotion discourse. This exercise draws attention to both the power to ensure the dominant presence of privileged voices at the conference as well as the discursive strategies deployed to ‘naturalize’ the social order of inequality. Results: Our analysis shows that the discourse informing the development of the Ottawa Charter strongly reflected Western/colonizer centric worldviews, and actively silenced the possibility of countervailing Indigenous and developing country voices. Conclusion: The Ottawa Charter espouses principles of participation, empowerment and social justice. We question then whether the genesis of the Ottawa Charter lives up to its own principles of practice. We conclude that reflexive practice is crucial to health promotion, which ought to include a preparedness for health promotion to more critically acknowledge its own history. (Global Health Promotion, 2013; 20(2): 22–29) Cataloger Haley Lesemann Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Beyond the Accolades: a postcolonial critique of the foundations of the Ottawa Charter Subject The topic of the resource Equality--Health aspects Colonialism Health Equity Marginalized Communities Public Health Public Policy https://library.icmglt.org/files/original/dd8718ea23fb5151b761de5ce287a283.jpeg 9cd3dcef4aae443704cbe6718de023d5 https://library.icmglt.org/files/original/e951cce6bb357dae4e6406b7355799f6.pdf 326d753be3f548d29e383c7e0baa2f93 Electronic Resource View Source <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118096">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118096</a> Document Type Journal article Author(s) Neil A. Lewis Jr., Norman Porticella, Jiawei Liu, Teairah Taylor, Jamila Michener, Colleen L. Barry, Rebekah H. Nagler, Sarah Gollust, Steven T. Moore, Erika Franklin Fowler, Jeff Niederdeppe Volume Vol. 377 Publisher Elsevier Journal Name Social Science & Medicine Publication Date 2025 ISBN 18735347 Region United States Language English Access Open Access Abstract Although U.S. health disparities are well-documented, the very communities that bear the brunt of those disparities are, ironically, underrepresented in scientific efforts to understand and address them. In two experiments (total N = 9523), we explored the consequences of omitting those perspectives for efforts to understand and address disparities in the COVID-19 pandemic. We found that, by prioritizing the perspectives of White Americans, studies of pandemic disparities likely missed important insights. Specifically, we purposively sampled the four largest racial and ethnic groups in the U.S. and found that people of color were consistently more concerned, and more willing to engage in both individual and collective efforts to address health disparities, than their White counterparts. In addition, messages highlighting structural drivers of health disparities further bolstered support for inequality mitigating policies. Cataloger Haley Lesemann Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Beyond Fear of Backlash: Effects of messages about structural drivers of COVID-19 disparities among large samples of Asian, Black, Hispanic, and White Americans Subject The topic of the resource COVID-19 (Disease)--Social aspects--United States COVID-19 Ethnic/Racial Minorities Health Disparities Health Equity Pandemic People of Color Public Policy Structural Racism https://library.icmglt.org/files/original/443a02cfffb5014beb8f9077fcc662d7.jpg d413dfeb609753cdbdfa0025759f489a https://library.icmglt.org/files/original/00fdecc351bb2304ac9a0e7db09b6b40.pdf ecbd27577eacdb0b35dd288164a94aee Electronic Resource View Source <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wss.2025.100316">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wss.2025.100316</a> Document Type Journal article Author(s) Rachel Deshpande, Meya Jurkus, Valorie A. Crooks, Benjamin Nii Badu Lartey, Geoff Bardwell Volume Vol. 9 Publisher Elsevier Journal Name Wellbeing, Space and Society Publication Date 2025 ISBN 26665581 Language English Access Open Access Abstract Given the ongoing overdose crisis, it is imperative to investigate how physical environments facilitate or protect against overdose in order to inform place-based interventions that seek to reduce risk. This scoping review synthesizes qualitative literature on the built environment and overdose to provide indepth perspectives and experiences of decision-making and drug use navigation. Studies published between January 1980 and October 2024 that describe built environment factors related to fatal and non-fatal overdose were included. The review followed the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis scoping review methodology, including the standardized checklist for reporting on scoping reviews(PRISMAScR). Forty articles were included. Results were divided into four overarching categories: indoor and outdoor locations that shape drug use behaviour and overdose; intersections of built environments and other social/structural factors impacting risk navigation, including privacy, sociability, and comfortability; and targeted interventions for the built environment that are intended to reduce overdose, including technologies and service availability. Key findings from this scoping review focus on how the built environment influences the consumption practices and experiences of people who use drugs when navigating harm reduction practices and the integrity of their drug-taking experience. Tensions exist between privacy and comfortability, and experiences of sociability and safety. Balancing surveillance versus monitoring is essential to consider when implementing built environment interventions that support individual autonomy. This research is important for understanding the built environment factors that facilitate or reduce the risk of overdose and is integral for informing policy and place-based interventions. Cataloger Haley Lesemann Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Between Solitude and Safety: A qualitative scoping review of overdose risk and the built environment Subject The topic of the resource Drug abuse--Social aspects Drug Use Environmental Factors Interventions Public Health Risk Factors Substance Use https://library.icmglt.org/files/original/a1b3a8d5b3c27d23873ae209fba52bfe.png aef16f910c2e17822ab852c3e0a0faff Electronic Resource View Source <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12443">https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12443</a> Document Type Journal article Author(s) Yeongjin Yu, Taeyun Jung Volume Vol. 25 Issue No. 1 Publisher Wiley, for the Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues Journal Name Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy Publication Date 2024 ISBN 15302415 Region South Korea Language English Access Restricted Access Abstract Within-group apologies restore important values and afford victims their dignity; however, the system justification motive may cause group authorities to hesitate in apologizing or to include system-justifying expressions to soothe the general public. Two studies were conducted, both on-campus (Study 1) and off-campus (Study 2), to empirically illustrate the public reception of within-group apologies (victim-focused and system-challenging) and silence. The results indicate that higher levels of system justification are associated with more favorable attitudes toward responses from authority. For the general public (Study 2), high-level justifiers supported the government's silence as much as the victim-focused apology, maintaining trust despite perceiving unfairness. Conversely, low-level justifiers, though negative overall, supported victim-focused apology more than system-challenging apology or silence. Additionally, the general public in Study 2 favored the victim-focused apology over the system-challenging one, rendering system-justifying expressions unnecessary. We propose that authorities prioritize apologies emphasizing dignity and respect for victims, instead of fearing potential negative reception influenced by the system justification motive. Cataloger Haley Lesemann Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Between Applause and Arm Crossing: Public reception of within-group apologies and the role of system justification Subject The topic of the resource Apologizing--Social aspects--Korea (South) Political Apology Social Justice Victims https://library.icmglt.org/files/original/9304d57df08ed51590708c13a5a727f5.png 9e989d4ad307df3d7af2addfd6d86a77 https://library.icmglt.org/files/original/ec6a3af0ac2ed9d75e0a47264f47c85f.pdf bb6b95f2c20264fc3b7a4e6915c2d962 Electronic Resource View Source <a href="https://doi.org/10.25430/pupj-PHRG-2025-AOF-6">https://doi.org/10.25430/pupj-PHRG-2025-AOF-6</a> Document Type Journal article Author(s) Indira Boutier, Conor Hill Volume Vol. 9 Issue No. 1 Publisher Padova University Press (Padua, Italy) Journal Name Peace Human Rights Governance Publication Date 2025 ISBN 25323474 Region Canada Language English Access Open Access Abstract This article explores Canada’s legal and institutional responses to the residential school system, arguing that symbolic recognition has often come at the expense of substantive structural reform. While the Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission have offered a framework for redress, they remain embedded within the same legal architecture that facilitated historical injustices. A decade after the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s 94 Calls to Action, progress on implementation remains uneven, revealing persistent gaps in resource allocation, institutional accountability, and public trust. The analysis adopts an interdisciplinary approach, combining legal doctrine, historical inquiry, and human rights analysis. It further examines how digital activism and mediated forms of memory operate as counterpoints to state-led reconciliation. These digital interventions expose the inertia of legal institutions by reframing the temporality of justice: while legal mechanisms proceed within procedural and bureaucratic logics, digital platforms demand immediacy, visibility, and affective engagement. This tension underlines a deeper paradox – namely, that visibility may increase disillusionment when not accompanied by institution transformation. The article situates reconciliation within the broader continuity of settler colonialism, contending that legal responses often reify the state’s dual role as both perpetrator and redeemer. Consequently, the article questions whether such frameworks can meaningfully deliver justice. Cataloger Haley Lesemann Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Between Acknowledgement and Inertia: Reflections on the Legacy of Canada's Residential School System Subject The topic of the resource Boarding schools--Canada--History Boarding Schools Collective Memory Colonialism Decolonization Human Rights Indigenous Children Indigenous peoples Reparations Social Media Transitional Justice https://library.icmglt.org/files/original/758272d7b718c02db6020a72502392f6.jpg ab4d505a15d7f7649445c2f05c0cbb74 https://library.icmglt.org/files/original/f398042045d63e362972f7463d90e196.pdf 20f4612e9ba0fee05c7fe30a412a6371 Electronic Resource View Source <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70152">https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70152</a> Document Type Journal article Author(s) Lisa D. Hawke, Wuraola Dada-Phillips, Hajar Seiyad, Josh Orson, Lianne Goldsmith, Susan Conway, Adam Jordan, Natasha Y. Sheikhan, Melissa Hiebert, Sean Kidd, Kerry Kuluski Volume Vol. 28 Issue No. 1 Publisher John Wiley & Sons Ltd Journal Name Health Expectations Publication Date 2025 ISBN 13697625 Region Canada Language English Access Open Access Abstract Introduction People with lived experience of mental health and/or substance use conditions and their families (PWLE) are increasingly engaged in research, yet rigorous guidelines for engagement are lacking. This study aims to co-design best practice guidelines to support the authentic, meaningful engagement of PWLE in mental health and/or substance use health research. Methods A multi-panel modified Delphi study was conducted with 61 expert panelists (35 PWLE and family members, 26 researchers/research support staff from across Canada). Participants rated 56 recommendations for importance and clarity. Consensus was defined as ≥ 70% of participants rating items at 6 or 7 on a 7-point Likert scale (‘very important’ or ‘essential’). Qualitative feedback was analysed using content analysis to identify new items and reviewed for improvements in item clarity. After each round, items not meeting the established threshold of importance were removed. Items with low clarity scores were reworded. A PWLE advisory panel was actively involved throughout the study's design, implementation, interpretation, and reporting, ensuring that the perspectives of people with lived experience were integrated throughout the research process. Results Three Delphi Rounds were conducted. In Round 1, importance ratings ranged from 51.7% to 96.7% of participants ranking the items above the established threshold (average 80.1%), with clarity ratings ranging from 39.3% to 86.9% (average 70.7%) and an average importance coefficient of variation (CV) of 0.16. Four items were deleted, two new items were added and fifty-five items were revised. In Round 2, 60 (98.4%) participants responded. Importance ratings ranged from 57.6% to 96.7% (average 80.2%; average CV = 0.20). Clarity ratings ranged from 50.9% to 93.2% (average 77.9%). Five items were deleted and eleven revised. In Round 3, 60 (98.4%) participants provided importance ratings ranging from 66.7% to 98.3% (average 80.8%; average CV = 0.20), and clarity ratings ranging from 63.3% to 94.9% (average 81.1%). Three items were deleted and nine were revised. Forty-four final best practices are proposed. Conclusion These co-developed best practice guidelines offer recommendations for meaningful PWLE engagement in mental health and/or substance use health research. By following these guidelines, research teams can ensure that PWLE contributions are genuinely valued and effectively integrated, ultimately enhancing the quality and impact of the research and fostering authentic collaboration. Patient and public involvement People with lived experience were engaged throughout the project as key team members, from a patient-oriented research perspective. They are also co-authors on this manuscript. Cataloger Haley Lesemann Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Best Practices Guidelines for the Engagement of People With Lived Experience and Family Members in Mental Health and Substance Use Health Research: A Modified Delphi Consensus Study Subject The topic of the resource Mental health--Research--Canada--Citizen participation Family Health Research Mental Health Mental Illness Psychiatric Disorders Substance Use